Upload what your team already has. Mentor126 builds the course, mentors every person through it one to one, and grades them on work they actually did.

No course authoring tool. No instructional designer. You describe what your team needs to know, and the Creator writes it from your sources.
PDFs, decks, docs, and spreadsheets. Upload them directly or connect Google Drive or OneDrive. Everything is indexed so the Creator can quote it.
Creator Studio is a chat. Describe the course, it proposes an outline, you push back, it rewrites. The lesson it just built sits open next to the conversation.
Generated content cites the document it came from, so nobody is trained on invented policy.

Send us the material you already train on and we build the first course with you on a call. You see it work on your own content instead of learning a tool first. Most teams take it from there after one session.
For topics that keep changing, keep one living document synthesized from all your sources. It flags where two of your own documents contradict each other, which is usually news to somebody.
Assign by job role and future joiners get the training automatically, without anyone remembering to do it.
The learner opens a conversation, not a course player. The Mentor presents the next lesson, answers questions in between, and coaches through mistakes instead of marking them wrong.

Mentor126 keeps a picture of what each person has proven and skips what they have already mastered. Nobody sits through a lesson they could teach.
Learners ask mid-lesson questions in plain language and get an answer pulled from your documents, with the citation attached.
Lessons and the interface follow each learner, so one course serves every region.
Most enablement tools get bought and never opened. There is no portal here. The training arrives as a conversation, picks up where the person left off, and you can see who actually engaged rather than guessing.
Live voice roleplay against an AI persona for anything conversational: objection handling, difficult feedback, an incident call. They talk, it answers back in voice, and the whole exchange is graded against a rubric afterward.
Completion is not evidence. Mentor126 scores people on work they actually produced, and every score links back to what they said and the rubric line it was judged on.
| What you want to know | Your LMS today | Mentor126 |
|---|---|---|
| Did they finish it? | Yes. That is the only thing it tracks. | Yes, and finishing is not what we report on. |
| Can they actually do it? | A multiple choice score, taken with the tab open next to the answers. | A rubric-graded case study, written answer, or live conversation. |
| Why did they get that score? | Right or wrong count. Nothing behind it. | Sub-scores per rubric dimension, next to what they actually said. |
| Which lesson is failing people? | Run a survey and hope somebody answers. | Failures are grouped by cause and surfaced to whoever wrote the lesson. |
| Who is confidently wrong? | No signal at all. | Captured directly, because certainty is asked for alongside the answer. |
Pick the one that matches the work. Four are graded the moment the learner finishes. Three are judged against a rubric written from your sources.
Whether the facts stuck.
The dangerous answer: confident and wrong.
Whether they can finish the work with the scaffolding removed.
Judgment under consequences, one decision at a time.
Applied reasoning on a realistic situation.
Whether they can explain it in their own words.
What they actually say out loud, under pressure.
Open any score and you see the sub-scores behind it, the learner's actual answer, and the rubric line each judgment came from. When someone asks whether a person is ready, you have something to show them.

The Confidence Quiz captures how sure someone was, not just whether they were right. The people who are certain and mistaken are the ones who cost you money.
Ask who is at risk in EMEA support in plain language. Get a chart back, and pin it to a dashboard that refreshes itself.
When people fail, the Mentor asks what made it hard, groups the answers, and shows you which lesson is the problem. The training improves without a survey.
Everything a security reviewer, an HR lead, and a finance owner will ask about, already in place.
Mandatory training runs on its own linear player, separate from the Mentor chat. Every completion produces a PDF certificate and a tamper-evident audit record, so proof holds up whether it is a regulator asking, a customer asking, or a partner program that pays rebates against certified headcount.
Every row is scoped to your organization and enforced by Postgres row-level security at the database layer, not by application code.
Email with a one-time code or Google sign-in. Four roles, and a session that locks to one organization until logout.
Invite by email, pre-assign courses at invite time, group people by job role, pause or remove access.
Your logo and colors applied across everything a learner sees.
Starter, Team, and Enterprise, with usage metering built in.

New reps practice the objection before they hear it from a prospect. You see who is ready to take calls.
Mandatory training with certificates and an audit trail that holds up when someone asks for it.
Procedures turned into short lessons people finish on a phone, in their own language.
Only if you want to. The fastest start is to send us what you already train on and build the first course together on a call, so you see it work on your own material instead of learning a tool first. Most teams run it themselves after one session.
No. On Starter and Team you add or remove seats at any time, month to month, prorated. A seat used for one onboarding wave frees up for the next hire. If your use is onboarding-only rather than ongoing, say so and we size the plan to that instead of to headcount.
15 days, up to 6 people, no credit card, full access with credits included. The window exists so the credits included in a trial stay finite, not to rush you. If you need longer to get your own content in, ask and we extend it.
Yes. Live roleplay is a two-way voice conversation with an AI persona: they speak, it responds in voice, and the whole exchange is graded against a rubric afterward. There is no video avatar today. It is voice and transcript, and the transcript is what the grade is built from.
Because there is no portal to remember. Training arrives as a conversation and picks up where the person left off, on a phone if that is what they have. And you are not guessing at adoption: you can see who engaged, who proved it, and which lesson people are failing.
As short as you want. You set the length when you describe the course, and five-minute lessons are a normal ask. Nobody has to sit through a 60-minute module to get one thing.
Yes. Compliance courses produce a PDF certificate and a tamper-evident audit record for every completion, which is what you need when a regulator, a customer, or a partner program asks for proof.
Generated lessons are grounded in the documents you upload and cite them. Rubrics are written from those same sources, so grading is judged against your material and not the model's opinion. Anything you edit is re-checked against your sources, and a change that cannot be verified is flagged rather than quietly accepted.
Yes. Every lesson is editable, including the brand voice and tone it picks up from your site, and you can ask the Creator to rewrite it in conversation before you publish.
They stay inside your organization. Data is isolated per organization at the database layer, and your sources are never used to train a model.
Upload one document and see what it becomes. Your first course is free.