Mentor126 turns your docs, decks, calls and website into training. Reps learn with an AI guide and practice out loud against AI buyers. You see who's actually ready. Every clip on this page is the real product, on a demo company's own documents.

Your reps practice the real conversation before it's real. They talk out loud to an AI buyer whose persona and objections come from your own material.
The rep sees who they are about to talk to, the objections that buyer will raise, and exactly what they are graded on, with the weights.
Then they talk. Out loud, in a real voice conversation with a buyer built from your material, and it answers back in character.

Attach MEDDIC, SPIN or your own playbook to a job role, and every roleplay for that role follows it. This one is MEDDIC.
The playbook shapes the practice calls, the grading rubric and the worked examples.

First attempt scores 48. Technical accuracy comes back at 45 percent with the reason written out: the rep recommended the ARC-7S when the job needed the ARC-7P, and couldn't produce the repeatability spec when Joe asked for it.
Each criterion has written levels, and a must-pass point the rep misses fails the call, so they try again. Second attempt, same rubric: that line comes back at 100 percent, and objection handling moves from 55 to 82.


Built from your decks, docs and call recordings. You describe what your sales reps need, and Mentor proposes the outline and builds the lessons once you say go.
Decks, docs, playbooks, web pages, YouTube, call recordings and screen-recorded demos. Upload them or import from Google Drive or OneDrive.
Recordings get timestamps, and screen recordings get the on-screen steps written down.

Two files went in. Three conflicts came out. The technical data sheet prices the ARC-7S at $38,500 and the marketing overview says $36,500, and neither team knew.
You find that out here, instead of when a rep quotes the wrong number to a customer. Mentor also lists the facts it couldn't find in your sources, so you can check them before you publish.

Type it the way you would explain it to a colleague. Mentor asks what it still needs to know, proposes an outline with a time estimate on every lesson, and waits for you to say go.

Twenty-five sales reps get it at once. New hires added to that job role later get its courses automatically, by email, without anyone remembering to assign them.

A rep building an ROI case asks what labour rate to use and where that number comes from. Mentor answers with $42 an hour, says the figure is fully loaded rather than base wage, and names the company document it came from.
Questions are never graded. Quizzes and practice calls run in their own panels, not in the chat.

PDFs, decks, docs, spreadsheets, YouTube, call recordings and screen-recorded demos, plus web pages added one URL at a time. Upload them or import from Google Drive or OneDrive.
Lessons are written from your material. Anything Mentor couldn't find in your sources is listed for a person to check before you publish.
Attach your sales playbook to a job role, MEDDIC, SPIN or your own, and it shapes every lesson built for that role: the practice calls, the rubric, the worked examples.
Group sources into a knowledge base. Mentor merges them, and when two of your documents disagree it flags the conflict for a person to settle instead of guessing.
Assign a course to a job role or to named people, with a due date. New hires added to the role later get its courses automatically, by email.
Ask for a change and Mentor writes a new version of the lesson. Reps keep the live version until you publish your edits.
Readings, podcasts, quizzes, scenarios, case studies, slides, flashcards, voice roleplay and more. The same two documents above became a reading, an infographic, a podcast, a practice call and a written checkpoint.


A lesson that tests something completes only at 70% or more. Retries are unlimited and the best score counts.
Their first sign-in asks their job and what they are working on. That is the whole intake.
By the time the course opens, one of the five lessons is struck out: "Covered in Sales Objection Handling". The rep proved those concepts in another course, so they start at four lessons. If they later fail it, the lesson reopens.


The course ends on a written checkpoint: two prompts and no options to pick from. The rep has to turn a plant's rework rate and staff turnover into metrics a CFO would act on, then name the model that fits and the next step in the deal. It is graded against a rubric built from the same documents, with a note that the turnover figure never made it into the final business case.


Four are scored by rules the moment the rep finishes. Three are graded against a rubric written from your material.
Whether the facts stuck.
Finds the reps who are sure and wrong.
Whether they can finish the work once the worked example fades.
Judgment under consequences, one decision at a time.
Applied reasoning on a realistic deal.
Whether they can explain it in their own words.
What they actually say out loud, under pressure.
Completion isn't evidence; a graded call is. See who's at risk and why, fix the lessons that aren't working, and show your boss the before and after.
Open any practice call and you see the score per criterion, the rep's own words quoted as evidence, and the rubric level each judgment matched.

Who's at risk and why, by rep, and each course's results down to the weakest quiz questions and roleplay criteria. Ask Mentor about your team's results in plain English and get the chart back.
3 of 8 reps are below the 70% pass mark on “Holds price without discounting” in the discovery call roleplay. Marco and Dana both offered a discount before asking about budget.
Discovery call roleplay · weakest criteria
Where the team loses marks
Needs help
Marco R. · Discovery call roleplay
“Honestly, I can probably get you fifteen percent off if we sign this month.”
Offered a discount before uncovering budget or the cost of downtime. The rubric expected him to anchor on value first.
Sample data from a demo team.
When reps keep failing the same lesson, you see it, fix it and check that the fix worked.
Lessons ranked by where reps struggle: pass rates, retries, and what reps said was the problem.
Go from the problem lesson straight into Create and ask Mentor for the change.
Every fix gets checked against how reps did before it, so you know whether it worked.
What you fixed and what changed, ready to forward.
| What you want to know | A typical LMS | Mentor126 |
|---|---|---|
| Did they finish it? | Yes. That is the main thing it tracks. | Yes, and an assessment only counts as done on a passing score. |
| Can they actually do it? | A multiple choice score. | A graded voice roleplay, case study or written answer. |
| Why did they get that score? | A count of right and wrong answers. | A score per rubric criterion, next to what the rep actually said. |
| Which lesson is failing people? | Run a survey and hope somebody answers. | A ranked list of what's not working, and a before-and-after check once you fix it. |
| Who is confidently wrong? | No signal. | The confidence quiz asks how sure they are alongside the answer. |
Workspace isolation, sign-in, people, branding and billing are in place, so a pilot doesn't start with a setup project.
Every row is scoped to your workspace and enforced by row-level security in the database. Data is hosted in the US.
Sign in with email, Google or Microsoft. Learner, Creator and Admin roles.
Invite by email or link, pick a course at invite time, group reps by job role, pause or remove access.
Your logo and colors in readings and infographics, and your brand voice in how lessons are written.
Starter, Team and Enterprise, priced per seat with learning credits included.
The interface and everything Mentor writes, in English or Spanish. In the browser on desktop and phone.
About fifteen minutes, and most of that is waiting while the lessons generate. The part a person does, adding sources, attaching the playbook and describing the course, is closer to five.
Only if you want to. We set up the first course with you on your own material, and most teams run it themselves after that.
Yes. It is a two-way voice conversation with an AI buyer built from your material. The rep speaks, the buyer answers in voice, and the call is graded against a rubric afterwards, quoting what the rep said. There is no video avatar; it is voice only.
It can, so it shows its work. Lessons are built from passages in your documents and cite them, and anything Mentor could not find in your sources is flagged for you to check before you publish. Rubrics are written from the same sources, so grading is judged against your material.
Mentor walks each rep through the course one lesson at a time and picks up where they left off, on a phone too. You don't have to guess: Insights shows who is moving, who passed and which lesson people keep failing.
As short as you want. You set the length when you describe the course, and five-minute lessons are a normal ask.
Yes. Ask Mentor for a change in conversation and it writes a new version of the lesson. Reps see your edits when you publish them.
They stay inside your workspace, isolated at the database level. We don't use your material to train AI models, and our main AI providers, Google and OpenAI, are used on paid APIs that don't train on customer data.
Get your reps' first course free, built from your website, docs and reviews. We walk you through it on a 30-minute call.
Get your free courseFree for teams with 5+ reps. No credit card.