Watch it build a course. Then watch someone prove they learned it.
Ten steps, in order, with the product running in every one. This is a demo manufacturer and its own product documents. Nothing on this page is a mockup.
Build the course.
One person who owns the training. No instructional designer, no authoring tool, and no starting from a blank page.
Add the documents you already have.
Product sheets, decks, process docs, spreadsheets. Drop them in or connect Google Drive or OneDrive. Everything gets read and indexed, and from this point on every lesson has to come from them.
It tells you where your own documents disagree.
Two files went in. Three contradictions came out. The technical data sheet prices the ARC-7S at $38,500 and the marketing overview says $36,500, and neither team knew.
You find that out here, on this screen, instead of finding out when a rep quotes the wrong number to a customer. Every line it writes carries the source it came from.
Add the way your team actually sells.
Upload your playbook and attach it to a job role. This one is MEDDIC. Pick from seven common methodologies or bring your own.
From here, everything built for that role is shaped by it. The practice calls, the grading rubric, the worked examples. Your method, not a generic one.
Ask for the course you want.
Type it the way you would explain it to a colleague. It asks what it still needs to know, proposes a course outline with a time estimate on every lesson, and waits for you to say go.
- Reads your sources and your playbook before it plans
- Shows every step it took to get there
- Rewrites any lesson you push back on
Publish to a role, not to a list of names.
Twenty five sales reps get it at once. Anyone who joins that role next month gets it automatically, without a person remembering to assign it.
One set of sources. Five kinds of lesson.
The same two documents became a reading, an infographic, a podcast, a practice call and a written checkpoint. Nobody has to sit through a format that does not suit the work.
Prove they can do it.
A sales rep signs in and opens her assigned course. She has a Mentor with her the whole way, and she does not get through it by clicking Next.
It asks who they are before it teaches them anything.
Two questions on first sign in: the job and what they are working on. From then on it skips what they have already proven elsewhere and pulls its examples from their own patch, rather than from a generic textbook.
Every lesson comes with a Mentor. Ask it anything.
Mid lesson she asks what payback period customers actually see, and where the number comes from. It answers out of the company's own marketing overview and says so.
The lesson does not restart, and nothing she asks is held against her. Questions are never graded.
Practice out loud, before it counts.
She sees who she is about to talk to, the three objections he is going to raise, and exactly what she is graded on, with the weights.
Then she talks. Out loud, in a real voice conversation, and it answers back in character.
Miss it. See exactly what to fix. Pass it.
First attempt scores 53. Not "try again", but which sentence cost her: she was asked for the payload capacity and answered with an adjective, and she never checked whether her answer had landed before moving on.
Second attempt, same rubric, same grader. 88. The improvement shows up in the exact place the first attempt was marked down, which is the difference between a score and something worth doing twice.
Finish on real answers, not multiple choice.
The course ends on a written checkpoint. She reads a scenario, works out which model fits and which number will persuade a CFO, and writes it in her own words. It is graded against a rubric built from the same documents the course came from, and the grade breaks down into what was accurate, what was complete and what was clear.
Something to show when someone asks if the team is ready.
A course that stays true
Built from your documents and tied back to them, so when a source changes you know what the change touches.
A score with the reasoning attached
Sub-scores per rubric line, next to the learner's actual words. Not a completion percentage.
The gaps, named
Who is confident and wrong, which lesson people keep failing, and who is not ready to take calls yet.
Four that come up every time.
How long does the first course really take?
The run above is about fifteen minutes of work, and most of that is the wait while five lessons generate. The part a person actually does, adding sources, attaching the playbook, describing the course, is closer to five.
Does it invent things?
Lessons are written from the documents you upload and cite them line by line. When two of your own documents disagree, it stops and flags the collision rather than picking a winner, which is the third step above. Rubrics come from those same documents, so grading is judged against your material.
Do we have to build it ourselves?
Only if you want to. Send us what you already train on and we build the first course with you on a call, so you see it work on your own material instead of learning a tool first.
Can we see this on our own documents?
Yes, and it is the fastest way to judge it. Book a walkthrough and bring one document you already train people on.
Run it on your own documents.
Bring one document you already train people on and watch the same ten steps happen to it. Fifteen days free, up to six people, no card.
